Military


hack
1. machine politician: a politician who belongs to a small clique that controls a political party for private rather than public ends
2. a mediocre and disdained writer
3. an old or over-worked horse

Tony Perkins is a hack. He’s a bigoted, fear-mongering, hateful hack at that. A former Republican Representative from Louisiana with a degree from the Fundamentalist Christian Liberty University and the current president of the poorly named hate-group the Family Research Council, one might expect that when he writes some blubbering nonsense about the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” undermining religious liberty, it might be laughable. One might not expect that to be on the front page of CNN though.

Yet, I actually applaud CNN for highlighting this man’s completely illogical and ignorant message in their political opinion column. It only proves to show how absolutely out-of-touch and dangerous organizations such as the Family Research Council really are. If they had an ounce of credibility left – they didn’t – it would be far out the window now.

Just take a look at a few of these man’s excuses for an argument:

Some people think allowing open homosexuality in the military means nothing more than opening a door that was previously closed. It means much more than that. It would mean simultaneously ushering out the back door anyone who disapproves of homosexual conduct, whether because of legitimate privacy and health concerns or because of moral or religious convictions.

These radical Christians cannot get over their absolute obsession with sex. He argues that if what a soldier does in the privacy of his own bedroom is offensive to people of certain religious convictions, then allowing them to serve in the military would be equivalent to giving the boot to those who find it offensive. Christianity also condemns sex outside of marriage and drinking to excess. Since those Christians who are offended by homosexuality should be equally offended by these practices, then by his logic, anyone who openly gets drunk or has sex with his girlfriend (or multiple girls – you know… there are health concerns, right?) outside of marriage, would also be detrimental to the US military.

He goes on to talk about the liberal “myths” surrounding homosexuality:

This means that all 1.4 million members of the U.S. military will be subject to sensitivity training intended to indoctrinate them into the myths of the homosexual movement: that people are born “gay” and cannot change and that homosexual conduct does no harm to the individual or to society.

I’m not going to even get into the issue of how hard he is trying to manipulate the reader into thinking that Richard Simmons is going to lead soldiers through a full college-length semester course intended to brainwash soldiers – hands on, of course – into being accepting of gays (and, oh no, maybe turning into one – ack!) when that is not the case or even close to being such. And while reading this claim that the military will “indoctrinate” soldiers with the “myths of the homosexual movement” should be enough for me to shrug this entire piece off as irrelevant and delusionally one-sided, the reality is that there are millions of people who are on the same page as this wacko – and that’s both sad and frightening.

To Perkins, it doesn’t matter that people who perpetuate the “myths” of homosexuality have decades of science and studies on their side, whereas his arguments are based on nothing of the sort – only 3,000 year old myths themselves. Even if there were no science or studies on homosexuality, the fact that guys like this are so obsessed with what people do in the bedroom because of some verses they pick and choose in the Bible around other verses that they completely ignore to do “times being different” is beyond laughable. Well, laughable if their bigoted agenda weren’t so serious.

These nutjobs are entitled to believe whatever they choose to believe (remember, these are many of the same folks and organizations who fought tooth and nail to keep schools segregated and interracial marriage illegal), but their complete lack of understanding that their bigoted beliefs cannot be apart of government jobs and public programs can only be called two things: stupidity or delusions. If he were to get what he wants, he would only continue to discriminate against thousands and thousands of good standing American citizens who want nothing more than to serve their country honorably and have the same rights and benefits of every other American.

I’ll leave you with this nonsensical gem that he finishes with that only leaves me baffled as to how this guy can be an educated adult (oh yeah, Liberty University) and former elected politician (oh yeah, Louisiana). I can’t even come up with an appropriate response to his complete misunderstanding of American politics and history:

It was religious liberty that drew the Pilgrims to America and it is religious liberty that leads off our Bill of Rights. But overturning the American military’s centuries-old ban on homosexual conduct, codified in a 1993 law, would mean placing sexual libertinism – a destructive left-wing social dogma found nowhere in the Constitution – above religious liberty, our nation’s first freedom.

You can read the entirety of his nonsense right here.

UPDATE: Nice. CNN has posted a response by Harry Knox, Director of the Human Rights Campaign’s Religion and Faith Program.

Holy hell – this is why I love Florida Congressman Alan Grayson (well, one of many reasons – how about this speech?). If there were politician trading cards, I would be collecting Grayson.

Grayson is introducing a bill called ‘The War Is Making You Poor Act’ – you can see his official website for it right here, where you can also sign a petition saying that you support the bill (or really, what it is that the bill stands for – we are wasting too much money on these wars). His introduction on his site says that the US government’s budget next year “allocates $159,000,000,000 to ‘contingency operations,’ to perpetuate the occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. That’s enough money to eliminate federal income taxes for the first $35,000 of every American’s income each year, and beyond that, leave over $15 billion that would cut the deficit.”

Watch the video and please pass it on.

We could very well see this man as our President someday.

Good thing that we have good rabbis like this to help us open our eyes. And to think, I almost wanted “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repealed until this man blew me away with such a logical, truthful explanation for what will happen if gays are allowed to openly serve in the military. Whew.

Sorry, I can’t take this guy seriously at all. What a nonsensical nut. Thank you Blag Hag for bringing this to my attention.

FtHood

The loss of those twelve innocent lives at Fort Hood yesterday due to a man’s betrayal of his fellow serviceman is both shocking and tragic. This tragedy has shined a light on the the irresponsibility of all these cable news channels, something that I have become disgusted with more and more as the years pass. Yesterday, they reported as “facts” that there were three shooters (when there was only one) and that one of the three had been shot dead (he was indeed shot, but he is still alive in a coma). That was the least offensive part of the coverage though, as it was almost immediate that the commentators began their prejudiced speculations without having all of the facts. Granted, I haven’t been able to follow this as closely as I have liked, since I’ve been busy these past twenty-four hours, but here is a little bit of what I heard on the news yesterday almost immediately in the aftermath of the shootings:

1) This was a possibly terrorist related – sorry, but violence committed by a Muslim does not equate terrorism. Why report this without any sort of base for the allegations? The focus on his Muslim faith in these early hours (especially when they were just assuming he was a Muslim because of his name without actually knowing for sure) was detestable.

2) He was born in the Middle East – but he was actually born in Virginia to Palestinian immigrants.

3) His motives – again, pure speculation by these “news” outlets. I heard speculations of him being a terrorist sympathizer, being pissed about his upcoming deployment to Iraq, and being angry about people mocking his faith on base. All of this baseless speculation has been an embarrassing excuse for “reporting.”

I understand that these news channels are in a war for the highest ratings, but didn’t they ever take a class on journalism ethics? Report the facts as they come in, talk to people who knew the man or were on the scene, but don’t go spreading this water cooler gossip. I don’t know the facts, I don’t know what his reasons for committing this atrocity were – so until those involved in the investigation release that sort of information, your job is to say, “Sorry folks, we don’t know why he did this, but we’ll release the information as soon as the investigation uncovers more facts.” And maybe we’ll never know and people can come to their own conclusions on their own, but it is not the job of the media to push their speculative beliefs onto their viewers, especially ones so tainted with ignorance.

As Obama said yesterday when speaking of the incident: “We don’t know all the answers yet. And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts.” Apparently, that isn’t common sense.