“Judge Walker’s ruling overturning Prop 8 is an outrageous disrespect for our Constitution and for the majority of people of the United States who believe marriage is the union of husband and wife. In every state of the union from California to Maine to Georgia, where the people have had a chance to vote they’ve affirmed that marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Congress now has the responsibility to act immediately to reaffirm marriage as a union of one man and one woman as our national policy. Today’s notorious decision also underscores the importance of the Senate vote tomorrow on the nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court because judges who oppose the American people are a growing threat to our society.”
Those are the words of former Speaker of the House and total douche Newt Gingrich. First off, Gingrich is going on marriage number three. His infidelity is well documented. When discussing the union of two people and the sanctity of marriage… what’s that they say about people in glass houses?
The bigoted Gingrich would like to take the basic human right of marriage and deprive homosexuals of that right.
Federal district judge Hon. Vaughn R. Walker recently rejected Proposition 8 as unconstitutional, which more than likely means a trip through the appeals process before leading to a final decision in the Supreme Court. Walker had a very eloquent rationale for his decision:
Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. Because California has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians, and because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.
Detractors will continue to chirp that California has voted not once, but twice, to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. People of logic will continue to counter that it doesn’t matter what the majority wants if it denies the civil liberties of but just one American citizen.
March 26, 2011 at 12:56 am
I hope you will start a campaign that works against Newt’s presidential ambitions and informs Republicans (his likely voters) of his checkered past. I don’t know how much money you can raise but a billboard or a commercial would help. There is too great a risk if he enters the presidential campaign. Uninformed voters will be easy prey for his silver tongue.
May 12, 2011 at 10:30 pm
When I think of Newt, I think of high self-importance policy and well who am I kidding he has as much chance of getting the GOP nomination as does Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump or Herman Cain (honestly what problems has he solved as a pizza man/ Federal Reserve worker?).
Newt Gingrich just wants another opportunity to cheat on his new wife with an intern just like the TRUMP did or does, the only difference is that Newt buys American unlike the DONALD who can’t handle the made in the US label. He is damaged goods, he belong in the scrap heap.
January 22, 2012 at 2:05 am
Newt Gringrich is not my first choice, but he is much better than the Socialists that we have running the country now.
January 26, 2012 at 8:10 pm
Gingrich sucks.